Skip Nav

Philosophy of Research

Types of research

❶Genetics, prevention and treatment: Benefits of taking part in research Risks in taking part in research Questions to ask about research Tests used in dementia research Ethical issues Types of research Philosophies guiding research The four main approaches Research methods Clinical trials What is a clinical trial?

Quantitative research




It is about recording, analysing and attempting to uncover the deeper meaning and significance of human behaviour and experience, including contradictory beliefs, behaviours and emotions.

The approach adopted by qualitative researchers tends to be inductive which means that they develop a theory or look for a pattern of meaning on the basis of the data that they have collected.

This involves a move from the specific to the general and is sometimes called a bottom-up approach. However, most research projects also involve a certain degree of deductive reasoning see section on quantitative research for more details. Qualitative researchers do not base their research on pre-determined hypotheses.

Nevertheless, they clearly identify a problem or topic that they want to explore and may be guided by a theoretical lens - a kind of overarching theory which provides a framework for their investigation.

The approach to data collection and analysis is methodical but allows for greater flexibility than in quantitative research.

Data is collected in textual form on the basis of observation and interaction with the participants e. It is not converted into numerical form and is not statistically analysed. Data collection may be carried out in several stages rather than once and for all. The researchers may even adapt the process mid-way, deciding to address additional issues or dropping questions which are not appropriate on the basis of what they learn during the process.

In some cases, the researchers will interview or observe a set number of people. In other cases, the process of data collection and analysis may continue until the researchers find that no new issues are emerging. This may mean adopting a less formal and less rigid approach than that used in quantitative research. It is believed that people are constantly trying to attribute meaning to their experience.

Consequently, the methods used may be more open-ended, less narrow and more exploratory particularly when very little is known about a particular subject. The researchers are free to go beyond the initial response that the participant gives and to ask why, how, in what way etc.

In this way, subsequent questions can be tailored to the responses just given. Qualitative research often involves a smaller number of participants. This may be because the methods used such as in-depth interviews are time and labour intensive but also because a large number of people are not needed for the purposes of statistical analysis or to make generalizations from the results.

The objectives of the two types of research and their underlying philosophical assumptions are simply different. The pragmatic approach to science involves using the method which appears best suited to the research problem and not getting caught up in philosophical debates about which is the best approach.

Pragmatic researchers therefore grant themselves the freedom to use any of the methods, techniques and procedures typically associated with quantitative or qualitative research. They recognise that every method has its limitations and that the different approaches can be complementary. They may also use different techniques at the same time or one after the other. For example, they might start with face-to-face interviews with several people or have a focus group and then use the findings to construct a questionnaire to measure attitudes in a large scale sample with the aim of carrying out statistical analysis.

Depending on which measures have been used, the data collected is analysed in the appropriate manner. However, it is sometimes possible to transform qualitative data into quantitative data and vice versa although transforming quantitative data into qualitative data is not very common.

Being able to mix different approaches has the advantages of enabling triangulation. Triangulation is a common feature of mixed methods studies. It involves, for example:. In some studies, qualitative and quantitative methods are used simultaneously.

In others, first one approach is used and then the next, with the second part of the study perhaps expanding on the results of the first. For example, a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews or focus group discussions might serve to obtain information which will then be used to contribute towards the development of an experimental measure or attitude scale, the results of which will be analysed statistically.

As they aim to bring about positive change in the lives of the research subjects, their approach is sometimes described as emancipatory. It is not a neutral stance. The researchers are likely to have a political agenda and to try to give the groups they are studying a voice. As they want their research to directly or indirectly result in some kind of reform, it is important that they involve the group being studied in the research, preferably at all stages , so as to avoid further marginalising them.

The researchers may adopt a less neutral position than that which is usually required in scientific research. This might involve interacting informally or even living amongst the research participants who are sometimes referred to as co-researchers in recognition that the study is not simply about them but also by them.

The findings of the research might be reported in more personal terms, often using the precise words of the research participants. Whilst this type of research could by criticised for not being objective, it should be noted that for some groups of people or for certain situations, it is necessary as otherwise the thoughts, feelings or behaviour of the various members of the group could not be accessed or fully understood.

Vulnerable groups are rarely in a position of power within society. For this reason, researchers are sometimes members of the group they are studying or have something in common with the members of the group. Is Alzheimer's disease hereditary? Is there a test that can predict Alzheimer's disease?

How is Alzheimer's disease diagnosed? Diagnosis of dementia Disclosure of the diagnosis Facing the diagnosis Taking care of yourself Developing coping strategies Maintaining a social network Attending self-help groups Accepting help from others Dealing with feelings and emotions Changing roles and how you see yourself On a more positive note Organising family support Dealing with practical issues Financial and administrative matters Driving Safety issues Employment issues Healthy eating Contact and communication Speaking, listening and communication Signs, symbols and texts Personal relationships Talking to children and adolescents Changing behaviour Lack of interest in hobbies Disorientation Managing everyday tasks Keeping an active mind Services Caring for someone with dementia The onset of the disease Diagnosis: Dealing with emotions Arranging who will be responsible for care Determining to what extent you can provide care How will Alzheimer's disease affect independent living?

About Incontinence, Ageing and Dementia Part 2: What implications for people with dementia and their carers? What progress so far? Launch of Written Declaration September Is Europe becoming more dementia friendly? Medical ethics and bioethics in Europe The four common bioethical principles Respect for autonomy Beneficence and non-maleficence Justice Other ethical principles Solidarity and interdependence Personhood Dignity Cultural issues linked to bioethical principles Ethical issues in practice Dementia as a disability?

More information about the changing definition of AD Reflect together on possible outcomes which might be good or bad for different people concerned, bearing in mind their lived experiences Take a stance, act accordingly and, bearing in mind that you did your best, try to come to terms with the outcome Reflect on the resolution of the dilemma and what you have learnt from the experience References Acknowledgements Ethics of dementia research The dementia ethics research project Background, definitions and scope Involving people with dementia Informed consent to dementia research Protecting the wellbeing Risk, benefit, burden and paternalism Clinical trials Epidemiological research Genetic research Research into end-of-life care The donation of brain and other tissue Publication and dissemination of research Glossary Annexes References Advance directives and personhood Critical interests Personal identity Subjective experience Discontinuity of interests Psychological continuity Existence over time Discussion on ethical principles The societal costs of dementia in Sweden Regional patterns: The economic environment of Alzheimer's disease in France Regional patterns: Who are the PharmaCog partners?

Academic Partners Pharmaceutical companies SMEs, patient group and regulatory authorities What do the partners bring to the project? Coordination Management approach Collaboration with other projects Who financially supports PharmaCog? How will PharmaCog benefit patients? Why do we need research? Who can take part in research?

Benefits of taking part in research Risks in taking part in research Questions to ask about research Tests used in dementia research Ethical issues Types of research Philosophies guiding research The four main approaches Research methods Clinical trials What is a clinical trial?

What are the official requirements for carrying out clinical trials in the European Union? Types of clinical trials Phases of clinical trials Continence care Guidelines What do we need from service providers and policy makers? Dementia as a policy priority PL2. Dementia as a human rights priority PL3. Dementia as a care priority PL4 Dementia as a research priority P1. In that section, we also introduce some important distinctions in research: Before the modern idea of research emerged, we had a term for what philosophers used to call research -- logical reasoning.

So, it should come as no surprise that some of the basic distinctions in logic have carried over into contemporary research. In Systems of Logic we discuss how two major logical systems, the inductive and deductive methods of reasoning, are related to modern research. OK, you knew that no introduction would be complete without considering something having to do with assumptions and philosophy. I thought I very cleverly snuck in the stuff about logic in the last paragraph.

All research is based on assumptions about how the world is perceived and how we can best come to understand it. Of course, nobody really knows how we can best understand the world, and philosophers have been arguing about that very question for at least two millennia now, so all we're going to do is look at how most contemporary social scientists approach the question of how we know about the world around us. We consider two major philosophical schools of thought -- Positivism and Post-Positivism -- that are especially important perspectives for contemporary social research OK, I'm only considering positivism and post-positivism here because these are the major schools of thought.

Forgive me for not considering the hotly debated alternatives like relativism, subjectivism, hermeneutics, deconstructivism, constructivism, feminism, etc. If you really want to cover that stuff, start your own Web site and send me your URL to stick in here. Quality is one of the most important issues in research.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

in relation to these five philosophies and the research design you will use to undertake your research (Figure ). The chapter will also help you to outline your philosophical.

Privacy FAQs

Research philosophy is a vast topic and here we will not be discussing this topic in great details. In business and economics dissertations at Bachelor’s level, you are not expected to discuss research philosophy in a great level of depth, and about one page in methodology chapter devoted to.

About Our Ads

Pragmatic approach to research (mixed methods) The pragmatic approach to science involves using the method which appears best suited to the research problem and not getting caught up in philosophical debates about which is the best approach. 2 Understanding research philosophies 4 and approaches LEARNING OUTCOMES By the end of this chapter you should: define the key terms epistemology, ontology and axiology and explain their relevance to business research; explain the relevance for business research of philosophical perspectives such as positivism, realism, pragmatism, interpretivism, objectivism, and.

Cookie Info

Research Methods for Business Students (Chapter 4) "Understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory development" 40 Pages. Research Methods for Business Students (Chapter 4) "Understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory development" Authors. (Chapter 4) "Understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory. Research Approach R esearch approaches are plans and the procedures for research Two important components in each definition are that the approach to research involves philosophical assumptions as well as distinct methods or procedures. The broad research approach is the. plan or proposal to conduct.