He cites a study, done by researchers at the University College London, in which the way users of research sites were observed to only skim the pages and move from one topic to the next, never coming back.
This was a study well done by a well known university, and thus a good source to cite. He only states what was learned in the study and fails to make a claim, thus missing the chance to connect such a strong source to his argument. This time he states that the internet is changing our way of reading, but does not say if he considers this good or bad.
The third source he quotes is Friedrich Nietzsche, saying that in he bought a typewriter and said it changed his writing style. It is not on the same level as the other sources he uses. It is an argument that works with few people. If this article were better organized it might be more convincing. If his purpose is to make the audience think, this is very effective; it is not if his purpose is to convince the audience that the internet is changing our thinking and learning processes in a negative way.
He says "Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski. Carr admits that we, as a culture, read a lot more because of the Web, but laments that "our ability to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction, remains largely disengaged.
As an advocate for technology in higher education over the past 20 years, I've heard similar warnings for years.
Indeed, some people reading this article may believe that Carr has hit the nail on the head. There is no question that our habits are changing: The Web has captured our attention and is now the default starting point for almost all work. The Web is different in almost all aspects from a book.
Printed books have contained the essential truths of humanity for half a millennium. The Web is where we look for knowledge that usually exists not in final, authoritative, single-author text blocks but in the aggregate of wisdom from many sites.
What is your e-mail address? You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Create a free website or blog at WordPress. By jakevandergriend in Uncategorized on November 10, Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public.
Is Google Making Us Stupid by Nicholas Carr, is an article on the effect of technology and the internet on our intellectual being. Carr begins to discuss Technology and what he believes is changing the way people think.
Google, says its chief executive, Eric Schmidt, is “a company that’s founded around the science of measurement,” and it is striving to “systematize everything” it does.
In Nicholas Carr's article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?," is to inform the younger, upcoming generations on how the Internet may have negative effects on the human . Is Google Making Us Stupid?, by Nicholas Carr Words | 6 Pages. The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson. The first of the many ideas conveyed in Carr’s article is that the brain is malleable like plastic.
An essay must always have an introduction, a body section, and finally, a conclusion, and a writer needs to pay attention to all these sections. In this article, guidelines will be provided, and these will be based on the review of “is Google making us stupid”. In Nicholas Carr’s story “Is Google Making Us Stupid” his main point is the question, is quick access to the internet making humans more impatient to read and want to skim through stuff more. This story is a very well informative story/5(1).