Those farmers who have own their lands for centuries where suddenly placed in the situation where they were demanded to give it up simply because they do not own legal papers to support their claims. These opened the doors for the rich hacienderos to grab those lands without title and requiring those who truly owns them to till it in exchange for heavy taxes and even a huge chuck of their plow.
The presence of armed men in the mural depicts how forced laws were established during this period in the Mexican history. Another noticeable element in the mural is the sight of children, also dressed in white; this suggests that the effects of the unreasonable allotment of farms lands to some these farmers who considered farming as their only source of living had devastating effects to these children.
These effects can be in the form of abuse and forced labor at their early age leading them to lose their chance for proper education Briton, ; Mora, The same idea of the rise of the proletariat class, the mural The Working Class displays the errors capitalism brought to the Mexicans. The seizure of the lands these helpless farmers own which were then converted into factories gave rise to the working class. Because these, factories were also under the clutches of foreign investors such as the United States which was also in turn supported by a puppet and dictatorial regime , least of the rights goes to the working class, who were in fact the largest and the main proponent of the industries.
Lack of alternatives pushed the working class to stay where they were not to mention the strict laws made compulsory by the government to those who dare to defy. This alone signaled the inevitable revolution which was depicted in one of the murals called Combate Doremus, The University Press of Kentucky.
Reflections of a Society — University of California Press, 3rd edition. University of Chicago Press. Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Since the first communist leader tried to over take a country, there has been another leader planning for a revolution. And Orwell was one to speak of how he sees the battle to be. Orwell has written several novels on the idea of revolutions against a superior government; There are many events that led up to the cause of the American Revolution. The French and Indian war caused the British to suffer from debt. The British needed to find Even though there were numerous revolutions across Italy all of them failed, firstly at liberating from Austrian rule and secondly unifying Italy as a whole.
Catholics and those clericals who were related to the church, clashed against the property of land and against the traditional oligarchy francisized and bourgeois , often addicted to Porfirio Diaz. This process commonly describes the oligarchy as the big loser and victim of the process of modernization caused by the revolution. For instance, the current level of popularity of the Virgin of Guadalupe, the number of times that the Pope John Paul II visited one of the largest Catholic nation on earth.
Mexico remains perhaps, today in the XXI century, as Catholic as on early twentieth century. Another ideology that starred in the revolutionary process, and possibly suffered the biggest defeat was the positivist thinking. Dominant in Mexico since the second half of the nineteenth century, it served to provide of theoretical grounds to the extensive dictatorship more than three decades of Porfirio Diaz, and helped to justify with its racist determinism the inferiority of the natives and the mestizoes, or the Mexican.
In fact, Porfirio considered the people of Mexico as immature for democracy, which was another argument for his more convenient and permanent re-election. Positivism was also tied to the landowner oligarchy, but more to the urban and conservative bourgeoisie, which was a permanent aspirant to social advancement. It was common to find their exponents in the huge state apparatus loyal to Diaz, in the universities and in the army.
It is this ideology that accelerates, according to general opinion, the revolutionary process. In addition there was a presence of anarchist ideology and to a lesser extent of socialism, which in some way guided the illiterate peasant forces, without actually entering them there were only sketches of these ideologies in the proposed policies and actions of the major peasant leaders, namely Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata.
Anarchism and socialism, sometimes separately, and many other times combined, strongly caught on the working class of Mexico City and other industrial centers of the country, they helped enormously in the turmoil of the pre-revolutionary process of , usually operating from exile for instance, associations of anarchists in California and socialists in Mississippi and then vaguely reflected in the agreements of the Convention of Aguascalientes, which approved the Ayala Plan, a cornerstone of the subsequent Mexican agrarian reform.
And finally we can define a last ideological factor, often ignored or downplayed, always misunderstood from the classical analysis, this is the native-peasant thought that is present throughout the whole history of Mexico and is the main foundation of the current Mexican nation. Many believe that without the discontent of these masses, accumulated over centuries of exploitation and absolute subjugation, the outbreak would not have occurred with the magnitude that it had.
Most of the military conflict was made up of disgruntled peasants in the case of the rebels or peasants enlisted by the drafts federal army. Different groups had very different goals for what the Mexican revolution would accomplish. The rural peasants and indigenous people wanted the land to be taken out of the hands of the aristocracy or the elite and have the land be evenly divided between the rural towns.
They wanted the territory of their ancestors back because it had been stripped from them during the regime of Porfirio Diaz. They also wanted to be taken out of poverty and to have farming available to them again so that they could sustain their lives and work for their living. Therefore, because the peasants were suffering under the regime of Diaz, they wholeheartedly supported the revolution and everything that came with it. The Roman Catholic Church, however, did not see the revolution as a good thing.
Diaz had strong government ties to the Catholic Church, and their goals were to keep their influence widespread, improve catholic education in Mexico, expansion of the Catholic press, and many more. However, while Madero kept the Catholic Church close, the Constitutionalists that succeeded Madero denounced the Catholic faith and in the Constitution of , there were specific articles that had restraining effects on the expansion of the Catholic Church.
The Church did not benefit from the revolution at all. The Mexican Revolution caused major changes in Mexico; its impact was far-reaching and drastic. The old political elite had been brushed aside, and a new revolutionary elite had taken power. The revolution advocated the centralization of power in Mexico, particularly in the president.
The role of the military had been substantially reduced. Also, there was the establishment of a formal political party, which helped to stabilize the political situation in Mexico. There were also great social reforms as a result of the revolution.
- The Mexican Revolution There was a huge revolution in the country of Mexico that started in the year , led by Porfirio Diaz, the president of Mexico in In the ’s Diaz was important to Mexican politics and then was elected president in
Sep 19, · The Mexican Revolution Essay The Mexican Revolution was a violent political and social upheaval that occurred in Mexico in the early 20th century. The revolution began in November as an effort to overthrow the year dictatorship of Porfirio Dнaz.
The Mexican Revolution Essay example Words | 3 Pages The Mexican Revolution The prevailing concern of the Mexican revolution was the welfare of the common Mexican worker, be he a farm worker on a Southern hacienda, or a rancher in the North. The Mexican Revolution The Mexican Revolution was the culmination of a mass of political, economic, and social tension that accompanied the regime of the dictator Porfirio Diaz.
The Mexican revolution, beginning in and officially ending in , was a time of constant bloodshed for the Mexican people. The presidential power changed from one man to another approximately 75 times during these 36 years. This revolution was main cause was Porifirio Diaz and his extremely corrupt government. The Mexican Revolution. N. p., n. d. Web. 2 Dec. This gave me good quote to add evidence to my essay plus let me take a look at the timeline of the Mexican Rev. it allowed my general knowledge about the topic increase. Wikipedia Mexican Revolution. N. p., n. d. Web. 27 Nov. Gave me general information about the Mexican Rev.